We are very close to Wrestlemania 33 in Orlando, Florida. Excitement for the event is reaching its peak as we count down the hours until the big event. Here is a list of 5 things that we think WWE SHOULDN’T do at Wrestlemania 33. Remember this is only our opinion!
1) WWE Shouldn’t – Put Goldberg vs Lesnar On Last
One of the biggest things that we don’t want to see happen at Wrestlemania 33 is the match between Brock Lesnar and Goldberg going on last.
I understand the argument that Brock and Goldberg are two of the biggest stars (for casual fans) and therefore should be the last match.
I think it is much more important for WWE to close the show with a great match and/or feel good moment.
When Brock faces Goldberg, the match is probably not going to go for that long. Many fans also know that Brock is likely going to win the title. A short match, where Brock wins would not be the best way WWE could end their PPV.
Instead, I would suggest putting Bray Wyatt vs Randy Orton on last. A match that has a long-term storyline and will give a young star (Wyatt) the chance to be pushed into super-stardom.
I would even suggest putting the Undertaker and Roman Reigns on last, especially if it is going to be the Deadman’s final match of his career.
There are plenty of options and I don’t think WWE should put on Lesnar and Goldberg on last at Wrestlemania, unless they have a big surprise up their sleeves.
Use the buttons below for the next thing that we think WWE shouldn’t do at Wrestlemania 33.
Just a footnote on a statement u said about Shane technically he is as much a wrestler as Goldberg was when he beat Brock at survivor series if not a little less rusty now cause he fought undertaker more recently than Goldberg had had a match b4 survivor series. (Not saying Shane is the same league as Goldberg by no means) But Shane has been in the ring during the time when things got real (Attitude Era) and held his own, was he great?, in ways yes he was and what he lacks in power he more than makes up for in heart and acrobatics. So even if u don’t like the idea I think AJ is in for a fight and is pretty evenly matched as long as Shane don’t break himself with a missed jump.
Agreed, I think it will be a good match!
#3 is a lose/lose situation. Most of us assume that if reigns wins, he would turn heel. Problem is, we’re going to boo him regardless. So booing him for the right reasons doesn’t negate that he is not a fan favorite. They would be booing him Because the win/turn would be obvious, especially if its at the helm of taker and its his last match. Which will be just another reason to him. Not necessarily because he won an arbitrary match… But Becuase of who he beat simply because all of WWE’s efforts of the last 3 years to get him over have failed.
Granted, ‘doing the honors’ is a long time wrestling tradition. But this just has FU written all over it. WWE is trying to reverse engineer this guy to get him over. Once reigns turns and beats taker, the fans will start to boo him louder than ever and WWE officials will bloviate as if this is what was planned all along. When in fact, they wanted reigns to be the next john cena — but he’s not. So now WWE is going to do the ol’ switch-a-roo and pretend this was their plan the whole time.